0 I was reading some grammar guides on the 1st, 2nd and 3rd conditional, and here's what the guides say in general:02br 02br 01b00first conditional02b00: 01i00real situations02i00 in the 01i00present or in the future. 02i02br 00ie: If I sleep too much, I'll get a headache.02br 02br 01b00second conditional02b00: 01i00unreal situations02i00 in the 01i00present or in the future.02br 02i00ie: If I slept too much, I would get a headache.02br 02br 01b00third conditional02b00: 01i00unreal situations02i00 in the 01i00past.02i02br 00ie: If I had slept too much, I would've gotten a headache.02br 02br 00I'm just wondering why can't "if I slept too much" simply assume events in the past, so we won't need 3rd con. anymore? Thanks.0-
Top answer
0 The third conditional is contrafactual. It says 01i 00If I had slept too much (AND I didn't sleep too much), I would have gotten a headache (BUT I didn't get a headache)02i 00. So you can't get rid of the third conditional by reassigning its meaning to the second conditional.
— CalifJim
Free · every Monday
Get the Weekly English Kit 📬
New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.
0 The third conditional is contrafactual. It says 01i00If I had slept too much (AND I didn't sleep too much), I would have gotten a headache (BUT I didn't get a headache)02i00. So you can't get rid of the third conditional by reassigning its meaning to the second conditional. Besides, no one person invents what words and expressions mean, so if you wanted to change w