Context: The goldfish view is not the same as our own, but goldfish could still formulate scientific laws governing the motion of the objects they observe outside their bowl. For example, due to the distortion, a freely moving object that we wouldobserve to move in a straight line would be observed by the goldfish to move along a curved path. Nevertheless, the goldfish could formulate scientific laws from their distorted frame of reference that would always hold true and that would enable them to make predictions about the future motion of objects outside the bowl. Their laws wouldbe more complicated than the laws in our frame, but simplicity is a matter of taste. If a goldfish formulated such a theory, we would have to admit the goldfish’s view as a valid picture of reality.
Top answer
d/. That rhymes with "mud". I don't recommend that pronunciation.
— CalifJim
Free · every Monday
Get the Weekly English Kit 📬
New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.
CalifJimI am not aware of any case where 'would' is pronounced /w?d/. That rhymes with "mud".
In British English phonological symbols, the vowel in mud is /?/. /?/ is the sound in about, comma, common, standard, father and one unstressed version of would.