Sneakergroove Posted 18 years ago
Linguistics Studies
Where there's smoke, there's hydrogen cyanide.
Hello everyone,
I would like to know how I could appropriately analyze the above sentence.
Could it be analyzed in the following way?
3rdpps BE THERE Th: Located (hydrogen cyanide) SUB CON (where) 3rdpps BE THERE Source
Any advice would be greatly appreciated.
sneakergroove
I would like to know how I could appropriately analyze the above sentence.
Could it be analyzed in the following way?
3rdpps BE THERE Th: Located (hydrogen cyanide) SUB CON (where) 3rdpps BE THERE Source
Any advice would be greatly appreciated.
sneakergroove
Top answer
Hi, Just out of curiosity, what do you call this type of analysis? I've never seen anything like it. Best wishes, - A.
Get the Weekly English Kit 📬
New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.
0
Hi,
Just out of curiosity, what do you call this type of analysis? I've never seen anything like it.
Best wishes, - A.
Just out of curiosity, what do you call this type of analysis? I've never seen anything like it.
Best wishes, - A.
0
It seems to work; though I'm not sure why the "smoke" is labelled "source". That would seem to restrict the meaning.
(I share Avangi's interest, by the way.)
MrP
(I share Avangi's interest, by the way.)
MrP
0
Hello,
First of all, thank you both for taking the time to respond to my post. I greatly appreciate it. To answer the first question, this type of analysis stems from a socio-cognitive grammar of English that I learned in university about 10 years ago.
To answer the second question, I chose Source to accompany the Th: Located. However, I understand that this is not fully correct
First of all, thank you both for taking the time to respond to my post. I greatly appreciate it. To answer the first question, this type of analysis stems from a socio-cognitive grammar of English that I learned in university about 10 years ago.
To answer the second question, I chose Source to accompany the Th: Located. However, I understand that this is not fully correct