01. I was just going when he came in.02br 02br 002. When he came in, I was just going.02br 02br 003. I was cooking when she knocked the door.02br 02br 004. When she knocked the door, I was cooking.02br 02br 005. She had just finished dressing when her guests arrived.02br 02br 006. When her guests arrived, she had just finished dressing.02br 02br 007. He was still smiling when the door opened and his wife came in.02br 02br 008. When the door opened and his wife came in, he was still smiling.02br 02br 00Which of the above sentences is not acceptable?0-
0They all seem fine to me; the pairs are essentially synonymous, though the focus lies toward the end of the sentences.02br 02br 00Small point: 01i00knocked 01b00on 02b00the door02br 02br 02i00 0-
1i001. What is the force that causes the moon to move about the earth? Newton said the answer came to him while he was sitting in a garden. 01font00He was thinking about this question 01b00when an apple fell to the ground.02b02font02i02br 02br 01i01font002. What is the
1i00What is the force that causes the moon to move about the earth? Newton said the answer came to him while he was sitting in a garden. 01i00__________________________________________________02i02i02br 02br 01i001. 01font00He was thinking about this question 01b00when an apple fell to the groun
0 I would use 01i00while 02i00in the third and fourth example. I can't see anything wrong in your sentences shifting clauses is just a choice with the help of which you stress the thing which seems most important to you.Did you understand this complicated sentence?:D 0-
0#3 is the best because the main clause, carrying the new and significant information, falls in the position of stress-- the end of the sentence.02br 02br 00#2 is the worst, for the opposite reasons: the point is in a dependent clause at the insignificant beginning of the statement.0-