The above means the person played in the past, not any longer.
2)I used to eat hot food. By saying the second sentence what I am telling you is even now I eat hot food.
So the first sentence evinces a past event whereas the second sentence evinces a past and present event.
This is strange. What do you think?
If, even today, you are in the practice of eating hot food, you would use the second sentence, wouldn't you? Of course, you could say either I can eat hot food or I eat hot food. Here I am interested in the use of the word 'used' in similar context.
Top answer
I would take sentence (2) to mean you ate hot food in the past but no longer do so. What is it about the 2nd sentence that leads you to infer a present event?
— PoorRichard
Free · every Monday
Get the Weekly English Kit 📬
New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.
That is my question too. So it would be incorrect to say I used to eat hot food tell the others that you even today eat hot food.
I know it would be 100% correct to say 'I am used to eating hot food'. This means, I believe, It was a habit for me to eat hot food in the past and even today it is very common to me to eat hot food.