I haven't been able to break away from the traditional rules that elementary school engrained in me, so I was wondering if the sentence below is correct. It is a fusion of both a complex sentence (with a dependent and independent clause) and another sentence using a semicolon to link the two.
Conventionally (at least what my elementary school taught me), a sentence can be linked to another sentence by use of a semi-colon. However, does it also apply to complex sentences?
Example:
Conventional: "I have a deathly fear of the dark. When I was young, my grandparents would tell me scary stories."
What I want to do: "I have a deathly fear of the dark; when I was young, my grandparents would tell me scary stories."
Three questions: 1.) As long as the first sentence is short, can I link the normal sentence with the second, complex sentence? In other words, are both sentences grammatically correct?
2.) If the first sentence were longer, would I be better off separating the two sentences with a period?
3.) Can I link TWO complex sentences via a semicolon? Example: "When I was young, I had a deathly fear of the dark; every night, my grandparents would tell me scary stories."
Thanks.
-rozarria
Edited to convey original poster's intended meaning.
Top answer
Hi, I haven't been able to break away from the traditional rules that elementary school engrained in me, so I was wondering if the sentence below is correct. It is a fusion of both a complex sentence (with a dependent and independent clause) and another sentence using a semicolon to link the two. Conventionally (at least what my elementary school taught me), a sentence can be linked to another sentence by use of a comma.
— Clive
Free · every Monday
Get the Weekly English Kit 📬
New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.
Hi, I haven't been able to break away from the traditional rules that elementary school engrained in me, so I was wondering if the sentence below is correct. It is a fusion of both a complex sentence (with a dependent and independent clause) and another sentence using a semicolon to link the two.
Conventionally (at least what my elementary school taught me), a sentence can be linked
Thank you, Clive. By the way, I first made this post anonymously before just making this account today. And I meant to say "a sentence can be linked to another sentence by use of a semicolon." Sorry about that embarrassing brainfart. Everyone knows that!
Your closing question to me was, "Why would you want to do this?"
I don't mean to deliberately over-complicate my sentences, b
Let me try: A semicolon is used to link two independent clauses together, with no connecting words (such as but, so, and, for). Though the two clauses are independent, they describe a closely related idea. It is not so much the length of the sentence that decides whether we should use a period, comma or semicolon. Your given sentences are correct, with or without the semicolons. For me, I
"A tiny gleam caught the corner of Absalom's eye; for a moment, the sun had escaped from behind the clouds as it dipped below the treeline."
I am relating Absalom's observation of a tiny light speck to his discovery that the speck is coming from the sun, which has managed to briefly permeate its light through the clouds. I feel that using a period would be too hard of a stop.
I hope you don't mind, but I've edited your first post to say what you mean so someone doesn't come along, read only the first post, and jump in with a "correction" to your statement that was a simple mistake.
Grammatically it is correct, but my personal view in terms of effectiveness, would be to either remove the fronted adverbial of time and use the semi-colon or keep the fronted as adverbial, but as a new sentence.