Hi, I was recently helping a relative with a homework that required the students to transform relative clauses into appositives. There was one particular sentence that sounded odd to me, and hence stayed in my head. I would like to know your opinion about it:
Justin Bieber, whom many people love, is a singer. If I am correct , whom many people love is the relative clause, but trying to turn it into an appositive made it sound odd to my ear:
Justin Bieber, loved by many people, is a singer.
What are your thoughts? Maybe you would have done it differently, or maybe I just wrongly identified the relative clause (I am a bit confused by the wording of the sentence, because I would have expected the relative clause to be written Justin Bieber is a singer whom many people love).
Thank you in advance
Top answer
I suspect that the answer is supposed to be Justin Bieber is a singer loved by many people. The other way round doesn't quite work, somehow.
— DMW
Free · every Monday
Get the Weekly English Kit 📬
New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.
If written correctly it would have read .... ' WHO many people love' ......... then it wouldn't have sounded odd to you. You are quite right to hear that WHOM as distinctly clunky.
JB - as the subject - is WHO. The object of a sentence deserves the WHOM. e.g. Who do many people love? He is loved by whom?
It is true that he is the subject of the sentence: JB (...) is a singer.
However, if we look at the appositive on its own, whom many people love, it seems to me that he is the object of their loving, i.e., they love him. However, I might be dead wrong.
Justin Bieber, a favourite of the people, is a singer. And even this would only sound sensible in a context encouraging greater cohesiveness because there are really two sentences' worth of information:
_ Entertainers are not very popular these days, wouldn't you say?