Dear Mr Micawber, I've ever asked you a question about the difference between "all" and "all off" (see the 'all and all of' thread), you remember?
Here's the original post you replied to mine,
"There's no nuances of difference in meaning of the words themselves, Jeff, but several minor differences in grammatical usage. It's a bit messy, but here's a summary of Swan, Practical English Usage:
1) Both OK before nouns with a determiner: 'All (of) the cake is gone; all (of) my friends are gone.' It is the determiner that makes the noun specific, not the 'all (of)'.
2) Only 'all' if no determiner: 'All people like pie; all sugar is sweet'.
3) Only 'all of' before object pronoun: 'All of them are hungry; all of it is gone'.
4) Only 'all' after object pronoun: 'She ate them all; he made it all himself'.
5) Only 'all of' with complements: 'Are those all of them?; that is not all of the pie'. "
So I was just wondering if 'each' and 'each of' can follow this law too.
Top answer
Here's the specific, 'each of functions of the body' is definitely wrong, right? Because, before noun 'functions', we have to put a determiner, or we can just say 'each functions' elliptically? Do I get it right?
— Jeff_999
Free · every Monday
Get the Weekly English Kit 📬
New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.
'each of functions of the body' is definitely wrong, right? Because, before noun 'functions', we have to put a determiner, or we can just say 'each functions' elliptically? Do I get it right?
I almost missed this one, even with the title. Moderators (at least this one) often have time only to look down the 'Replies' column to see which new posts are unanswered-- but you 'answered' yourself twice!
Now let's see--
We can't really compare 'all (of)' with 'each (of)' totally, because the first is inclusive while the latter is distributive: no non-c