0
Usenet Posted 22 years ago
Usage

Their... singular or plural?

Hi everybody,
I have a very tricky question. I'm from Spain and we can hardly agree with this even in our own language! It is about sentences like:

-Forget about what people do in their HOME => this could give the impression that all of them are sharing the same home!

-Forget about what people do in their HOMES => this could give the impression that the same person owns several homes!

In other words, there are several homes but we mean each person and his/her only home. Which is the right way to express this in English?

Thanks in advance,
Sergio
  

Top answer

Sergio wrote on 26 Oct 2004: [nq:1]Hi everybody, I have a very tricky question. I'm from Spain and we can hardly agree with this even in ... homes but we mean each person and his/her only home.

Free · every Monday

Get the Weekly English Kit 📬

New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.

13 Answers
0
Sergio wrote on 26 Oct 2004:
[nq:1]Hi everybody, I have a very tricky question. I'm from Spain and we can hardly agree with this even in ... homes but we mean each person and his/her only home. Which is the right way to express this in English?[/nq]
There are a couple of answers to this question.
(1) The second sentence above (plural "homes") is one answer, even though there is the amb
0
[nq:1]I have a very tricky question. I'm from Spain and we can hardly agree with this even in our own ... homes but we mean each person and his/her only home. Which is the right way to express this in English?[/nq]
Neither. Use the obvious idiom and say:
Forget about what people do AT HOME.
0
J. W. Love wrote on 26 Oct 2004:
[nq:2]I have a very tricky question. I'm from Spain and ... Which is the right way to express this in English?[/nq]
[nq:1]Neither. Use the obvious idiom and say: Forget about what people do AT HOME.[/nq]
Yep, that's a much better suggestion.

Franke: EFL teacher & medical editor
For email, replace numbers with English alphabet.
0
[nq:1]J. W. Love wrote on 26 Oct 2004:[/nq]
[nq:2]Neither. Use the obvious idiom and say: Forget about what people do AT HOME.[/nq]
[nq:1]Yep, that's a much better suggestion.[/nq]
But it covers only the home(s).
What about the parents of an only child? Or the dog lovers? Or the believers who worship their gods, are they all pluritheists?
0
[nq:1]Sergio wrote on 26 Oct 2004:[/nq]
[nq:2]Hi everybody, I have a very tricky question. I'm from ... Which is the right way to express this in English?[/nq]
[nq:1]There are a couple of answers to this question. (1) The second sentence above (plural "homes") is one answer, even ... totally unobjectionable to the PC-minded is to say something like "Forget about what a person does in their
0
[nq:1]Hi everybody, I have a very tricky question. I'm from Spain and we can hardly agree with this even in ... homes but we mean each person and his/her only home. Which is the right way to express this in English?[/nq]
I prefer the second version, but I don't think you will be misunderstood if you use the first version. The first version is, as you point out, the one to use when all the peop
0
[nq:1]Proper English used to use the "common gender"; the masculinesingular pronoun was used when a person of undetermined *** was spoken of. Nowadays, I've seen things like "Every mother must care for their child."[/nq]
Cece, you're asking for trouble! Take a look at the archive for the last week or two. Or maybe just wait for about three months, and see us do it all again.
As I've said,
0
[nq:1](3) Another solution that most people concerned about style don't like but seems totally unobjectionable to the PC-minded is to say something like "Forget about what a person does in their own home".[/nq]
Also totally objectionable to those of us who learned it as part of our dialect as children decades before anybody decided to castigate speech as "PC".

Evan Kirshenbaum + HP La
0
[nq:2]Nowadays, I've seen things like "Every mother must care for their child."[/nq]
Sounds perfectly right to me - indeterminate number of mothers. Maybe it's a generational thing.

JGH
0
[nq:1]Sounds perfectly right to me - indeterminate number of mothers. Maybe it's a generational thing.[/nq]
Yes, but all of them are women, I think.

Skitt (in Hayward, California)
www.geocities.com/opus731/