Anonymous Posted 20 years ago
Grammar
The use of "range"
0 I don't know if this is the right forum for this question. If it's not, do you have an idea where I might find the answer?.... 02 br
02 br
00 Is it proper to use range in the following way: "The known range for this owl is below 4,000 feet above mean sea level." 02 br
02 br
00 One person argues this is improper because there is no "range" stated, such as "...1,000 to 4,000 feet...". I think the range is implied - all elevations up to 4,000 feet. 0-
02 br
00 Is it proper to use range in the following way: "The known range for this owl is below 4,000 feet above mean sea level." 02 br
02 br
00 One person argues this is improper because there is no "range" stated, such as "...1,000 to 4,000 feet...". I think the range is implied - all elevations up to 4,000 feet. 0-
Top answer
". I think the range is implied - all elevations up to 4,000 feet. 02 font 02 br 02 br 00 The word 'range' has a number of different meanings.
Get the Weekly English Kit 📬
New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.
0
0 Hi, 02 br
02 br
01 font 00 Is it proper to use range in the following way: "The known range for this owl is below 4,000 feet above mean sea level." 02 font 01 font 00 One person argues this is improper because there is no "range" stated, such as "...1,000 to 4,000 feet...". I think the range is implied - all elevation
02 br
01 font 00 Is it proper to use range in the following way: "The known range for this owl is below 4,000 feet above mean sea level." 02 font 01 font 00 One person argues this is improper because there is no "range" stated, such as "...1,000 to 4,000 feet...". I think the range is implied - all elevation
0