0There's a story about a farmer who had a donkey. In that story there are the following sentences. 02br 02br 00 A few shovel loads later, the farmer finally looked down the well and was astonished at what he saw. The donkey 00would00 shake it off and take a step up. Pretty soon, the donkey stepped up over the edge of the well. 02br 02br 00What I want to ask is the meaning of the underlined "would." Can you tell me and another example if you can. 02br 02br 00And a man I know gave me the below answer.02br 02br 02br 00The "would" here gives an idea of a repeated action in the past.00 It could give the sense as always or every time 02br 02br 00For example02br 02br 00When I went to bed, I would listen to the owls outside.02br 00When the child was happy, he would laugh.02br 02br 02br 00But I don't think my 'would' cannot mean a repeated action in the past.02br 02br 00You see, donkey just once shook it off and took a step up, not repeatedly.02br 02br 00Can you give me an exact meaning of00 would00 in question?02br 02br 0-
Top answer
0-
— Mister Micawber
Free · every Monday
Get the Weekly English Kit 📬
New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.
0 .02br 00It does indeed indicate a repeated action in the past: 01u00every time02u00 the farmer threw a shovel full down the well onto the donkey's back, the donkey would shake it off and take 01u00another 02u00step up.0-
01cite10Stenka2512cite10I don't think my 'would' cannot mean a repeated action in the past12blockquote
10That's strange, since both Yankee and I answered the exact same question for you last month, and both of us told you it means repeated action in the past.02br 02br 00See 05000.02br
0Yeah, you are right.02br 02br 00But 0100StartFragment00>02br 02br 01font00The story has not been quoted in full02font00. 01font00That's why it seems a little strange02font00.02br 02br 00...02br 02br 00A few sh