Recently, we've had a discussion on the "rank" of various countries, in particular how rich they were per capita. GNP per capita, and in the most recent survey I've found it seems as if the US and Denmark has swapped place. 2003, Denmark was number eight, the US number five. Now Denmark is number eight, USA number seven. But of course, the United States is alsoy a country which follows an economic policy with enormous deficits on the budget and on the balance of payments.
Do you remember that 75 years ago, Argentine and the US competed on being the richest country of the world? To-day the Argentinians migrate {back} to the much richer Spain. When will Americans begin to migrate {back} to the much richer Britain? But of course, the Decline and Fall of the American Empire would be a disaster to /all/ the countries of the world - it would mean an new depressen. So America: improve on your economic policy.
http://www.alsagerschool.co.uk/subjects/sub content/geography/Gpop/HTMLE NH/stats/gnp.htm 1 Luxembourg 41210 2 Switzerland 40630 3 Japan 39640 4 Norway 31250 5 Denmark 29890 6 Germany 27510 7 United States 26980 8 Austria 26890 9 Singapore 26730 10 France 24990 11 Iceland 24950 12 Belgium 24710 13 Netherlands 24000 14 Sweden 23750 15 Finland 20580 16 Canada 19380 17 Italy 19020 18 Australia 18720 19 United Kingdom 18700 20 United Arab Emirates 17400 21 Kuwait 17390 22 Israel 15920 23 Ireland 14710 24 New Zealand 14340 25 Spain 13580 26 Bahamas 11940 27 Qatar 11600 28 Portugal 9740 29 Korea, South 9700 30 Argentina 8330 31 Greece 8210 32 Slovenia 8200 33 Bahrain 7840 34 Saudi Arabia 7040 35 Seychelles 6620 36 Barbados 6560 37 St.Kitts-Nevis 5170 38 Uruguay 5170 39 Oman 4820 40 Chile 4160 41 Hungary 4120 42 Malaysia 3890 43 Czech Republic 3870 44 Trinidad and Tobago 3770 45 Brazil 3640 46 Gabon 3490 47 Mauritius 3380 48 Mexico 3370 49 Saint Lucia 3370 50 Croatia 3250 51 South Africa 3160 52 Botswana 3020 53 Venezuela 3020 54 Dominica 2990 55 Grenada 2980 56 Slovakia 2950 57 Estonia 2860 58 Poland 2790 59 Turkey 2780 60 Panama 2750 61 Thailand 2740 62 Lebanon 2660 63 Belize 2630 64 Costa Rica 2610 65 Fiji 2440 66 Peru 2310 67 St.Vincent and the Grenadines 2280 68 Latvia 2270 69 Russia 2240 70 Belarus 2070 71 Namibia 2000 72 Colombia 1910 73 Lithuania 1900 74 Tunisia 1820 75 Paraguay 1690 76 Ukraine 1630 77 El Salvador 1610 78 Algeria 1600 79 Jamaica 1510 80 Jordan 1510 81 Romania 1480 82 Dominican Republic 1460 83 Ecuador 1390 84 Guatemala 1340 85 Bulgaria 1330 86 Kazakhstan 1330 87 Vanuatu 1200 88 Swaziland 1170 89 Papua-New Guinea 1160 90 Syria 1120 91 Western Samoa 1120 92 Morocco 1110 93 Philippines 1050 94 Maldives 990 95 Indonesia 980 96 Cape Verde 960 97 Moldova 920 98 Turkmenistan 920 99 Solomon Islands 910 100 Macedonia 860 101 Egypt 790 102 Lesotho 770 103 Armenia 730 104 Kyrgyzstan 700 105 Sri Lanka 700 106 Congo 680 107 Albania 670 108 Cote d'Ivoire 660 109 Cameroon 650 110 China 620 111 Honduras 600 112 Senegal 600 113 Guyana 590 114 Uzbekistan 570 115 Guinea 550 116 Zimbabwe 540 117 Azerbaijan 480 118 Comoros 470 119 Mauritania 460 120 Pakistan 460 121 Georgia 440 122 Bhutan 420 123 Angola 410 124 Zambia 400 125 Ghana 390 126 Equatorial Guinea 380 127 Nicaragua 380 128 Suriname 380 129 Benin 370 130 Laos 350 131 Sao Tome and Principe 350 132 Central African Republic 340 133 India 340 134 Tajikistan 340 135 Gambia 320 136 Mongolia 310 137 Togo 310 138 Bolivia 300 139 Kenya 280 140 Cambodia 270 141 Nigeria 260 142 Yemen 260 143 Guinea-Bissau 250 144 Haiti 250 145 Mali 250 146 Bangladesh 240 147 Uganda 240 148 Vietnam 240 149 Burkina Faso 230 150 Madagascar 230 151 Niger 220 152 Nepal 200 153 Chad 180 154 Rwanda 180 155 Sierra Leone 180 156 Malawi 170 157 Burundi 160 158 Tanzania 120 159 Zaire 120 160 Ethiopia 100 161 Mozambique 80
Per Erik Rønne
Top answer
[nq:1]Recently, we've had a discussion on the "rank" of various countries, in particular how rich they were per capita. GNP per capita, and in the most recent survey I've found [/nq] I managed to reconstruct the URL you cited (I don't know if it was you or GoogleGroups that inserted the hyphens). com/ddqw4 Examining the page, I see: "The information is taken from the Population Concern 1997 World Population Data Sheet.
— Usenet
Free · every Monday
Get the Weekly English Kit 📬
New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.
[nq:1]Recently, we've had a discussion on the "rank" of various countries, in particular how rich they were per capita. GNP per capita, and in the most recent survey I've found [/nq] I managed to reconstruct the URL you cited (I don't know if it was you or GoogleGroups that inserted the hyphens). Here is a short link to the page:
[nq:1]Do you remember that 75 years ago, Argentine and the US competed on being the richest country of the world? To-day the Argentinians migrate {back} to the much richer Spain. When will Americans begin to migrate {back} to the much richer Britain?[/nq] Both Argentinians and Americans have much more diverse origins than, respectively, Spain and Britain, so "going back" could be something of
[nq:2]Do you remember that 75 years ago, Argentine and the ... Americans begin to migrate {back} to the much richer Britain?[/nq] [nq:1]Both Argentinians and Americans have much more diverse origins than, respectively, Spain and Britain, so "going back" could be something of a problem. Each individual might need to be dismembered and their parts dispatched to their ancestral countries.[/nq]
[nq:2]Do you remember that 75 years ago, Argentine and the ... Americans begin to migrate {back} to the much richer Britain?[/nq] [nq:1]Both Argentinians and Americans have much more diverse origins than, respectively, Spain and Britain, so "going back" could be something of a problem.[/nq] I know but the Danish migrants to the two countries have had their Danish tongue replaced with Spani
[nq:2]Do you remember that 75 years ago, Argentine and the ... Americans begin to migrate {back} to the much richer Britain?[/nq] [nq:1]Both Argentinians and Americans have much more diverse origins than, respectively, Spain and Britain, so "going back" could be something of a problem.[/nq] I know, but the Danish migrants to the two countries have had their Danish tongue replaced with Span
[nq:1]I know, but the Danish migrants to the two countries have had their Danish tongue replaced with Spanish and English respectively,[/nq] That seems rather cruel and unusual. [nq:1]And, btw, Spain is a much more modern country than is the US. Please remember that 70% of the population ... children. In the US the President tries to return his country back to the age of the late Queen Vic
[nq:2]Both Argentinians and Americans have much more diverse originsthan, respectively, ... to be dismembered andtheir parts dispatched to their ancestral countries.[/nq] [nq:1]For Americans I wouldn't argue with that, but I'd say a largemajority of Argentinians were indeed of either Spanish or ... rather than Italy simply because of the language question, and once in the EU they can choose wh
[nq:1]And, btw, Spain is much more modern a country than is the US. Please remember that 70% of the population ... children. In the US the President tries to return his country back to the age of the late Queen Victoria;-(.[/nq] I would use "progressive" in that sentence rather than "modern".
The American people in general reject homosexual marriage and adoption by homosexuals. The Pr
[nq:1]Sure, but sometimes what's "modern" is not so clear. Is it "modern" to force men ('boys') to wear shorts, even in relatively cold weather? If it is modern, is this the sort of modern we want?[/nq] That's the second time you've mentioned mandatory shorts in Denmark (?!). Got link? Googling gets me nothing. I find this odd. Are you being facetious, or is there some weird, arcane law? L