ALexW Posted 20 years ago
Linguistics Studies
That is
0 How is the phrase "that is," meaning "namely," properly used and punctuated in the following sentence: 02 br
02 br
00 "In support of my argument, I submit, as I did previously, that Report IV is flawed for the same reason that Reports I through III were flawed, 01 b 00 that is 02 b 00 , it was not signed by a supervisor." 02 br
02 br
00 A colleague asked me about this, and I told her "that is" is idiomatic and she could not go wrong surrounding it with commas as above, placing a semi colon before it and a comma after it, or omitting the trailing comma (but using a preceding comma or semi). A quick survey of Batlett's quotations (for synonyms "namely" and "viz.," since searching for "that is" is useless) shows that all of these iterations are in common usage. However, I am troubled and would like a more expert opinion. 02 br
02 br
00 I originally considered "that is" to function as an adjectival phrase modifying "reason." Now, though, I think it looks more like a conjunctive adverb. But, I am leery of labeling something an adverb just because it doesn't seem to fit anywhere else. Does anyone care to offer an opinion? If it is a conjunctive adverb, must it be preceded by a semi colon or can it, like "otherwise," be preceded by a comma? 0-
02 br
00 "In support of my argument, I submit, as I did previously, that Report IV is flawed for the same reason that Reports I through III were flawed, 01 b 00 that is 02 b 00 , it was not signed by a supervisor." 02 br
02 br
00 A colleague asked me about this, and I told her "that is" is idiomatic and she could not go wrong surrounding it with commas as above, placing a semi colon before it and a comma after it, or omitting the trailing comma (but using a preceding comma or semi). A quick survey of Batlett's quotations (for synonyms "namely" and "viz.," since searching for "that is" is useless) shows that all of these iterations are in common usage. However, I am troubled and would like a more expert opinion. 02 br
02 br
00 I originally considered "that is" to function as an adjectival phrase modifying "reason." Now, though, I think it looks more like a conjunctive adverb. But, I am leery of labeling something an adverb just because it doesn't seem to fit anywhere else. Does anyone care to offer an opinion? If it is a conjunctive adverb, must it be preceded by a semi colon or can it, like "otherwise," be preceded by a comma? 0-
Top answer
02 br 02 br 01 i 00 Quirk et al 02 i 00 call that is an 'appositional conjunct', and a nonrestrictive one at that. In another section they indicate that the convention is to precede 01 b 01 i 00 that is 02 i 02 b 00 with a semicolon; however, among their examples are several in which it is preceded by an m-dash. They also state, interestingly, that it may be preceded by a comma if the following text is a phrase rather than a clause.
Get the Weekly English Kit 📬
New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.
0
0 Hello Alex, and welcome to English Forums. 02 br
02 br
01 i 00 Quirk et al 02 i 00 call that is an 'appositional conjunct', and a nonrestrictive one at that. In another section they indicate that the convention is to precede 01 b 01 i 00 that is 02 i 02 b 00 with a semicolon; however, among their examples are several in which it is prec
02 br
01 i 00 Quirk et al 02 i 00 call that is an 'appositional conjunct', and a nonrestrictive one at that. In another section they indicate that the convention is to precede 01 b 01 i 00 that is 02 i 02 b 00 with a semicolon; however, among their examples are several in which it is prec
00