0Hi,02br 02br 00I learned that when a past perfect is used in sentences with the words 'before' and 'after', the use of a past perfect is not necessary, as in:02br 02br 001. I washed/had washed dishes before Mary came into the kitchen. 02br 02br 00Here, am I saying the two events, my washing dishes and Mary's walking in, took place at the same time eventhough my washing should have started before her walking into the kitchen?02br 02br 002. I was washing dishes when Mary walking into the kitchen.02br 02br 00How about here?02br 02br 003. I had been washing dishes when Mary walked into the kitchen.02br 02br 00I think, this one leaves a possibility that my washing could have stopped at the moment Mary walked in although my washing should have been started and continued until the moment of her walking in.02br 02br 00So between no. 2. and 3, the only difference is no. 2 leaves a possibility that my action could have been stopped, whereas, no. 1. leaves no such possiblity? 0-
0 .02br 02br 001. I washed dishes before Mary came into the kitchen.-- 01b00The washing was finished before she entered.02b02br 02br 002. I was washing dishes when Mary walking into the kitchen.-- 01b00She saw you washing dishes.02b02br 02br 003. I had been washing dishes when Mary walked into the k
0Thank you. Can I be able to use the third sentence if I was trying to make a note of the fact that the task of washing dishes was an on-going thing, emphasizing the continuous aspect of it eventhough it was an event that probably was finished when Mary walked in?02br 02br 003. I had been washing dishes when Mary walked into the kitchen.-- 01b00The washing was fin
01cite10Anonymous12cite10Thank you. Can I be able to use the third sentence if I was trying to make a note of the fact that the task of washing dishes was an on-going thing, emphasizing the continuous aspect of it eventhough it was an event that probably was finished when Mary walked in?12br 12br 103. I had been washi