Many people say both "place to live" and "place to live in" in such sentences as below:
a) I found a new place to live. b) I found a new place to live in.
To the best of my knowledge, the sentence a) is grammatically incorrect. So I googled the two phrases and got the results as follows:
She is happy to have found such a nice place to live in. Cambridge is an attractive place, and quite an easy place to live in. The world will be a better place to live in. Bali is a wonderful place to live in. Few care about making the world a better place to live in. ............................................................................................................................................... It's a better place to live. It's hard to find a place to live quickly. I always dream of flying to USA because that's a wonderful place to live and to study. Los Angeles is a pleasant place to live. I found a new place to live, in West Ham.
Are both a) and b) grammartically acceptable/correct? If so, why?
Greatly looking forward to your insight.
Thanks in advance.
Jae From ROK
Top answer
Hello I too am a leaner but I am glad if I could help you with my humble knowledge. 'Place' is a *** noun. It is a noun but also it can work as a location-adverb without help of prepositions.
— Paco2004
Free · every Monday
Get the Weekly English Kit 📬
New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.
Without context, I'd say: "I've found a new place ... And it would be easier to say "I've found a new house/home", since both "house" and"home" imply that you live there.
1. I have to find a room to sleep. 2. I have to find a room to sleep in. I'll choose #2 because "a room to sleep in" is kind of a fixed noun phrase. If I happened to find the sentence #1 somewhere, I would read it as "I have to find a room in order to sleep", but it sounds somewhat weird to me.