This might be a weird question, but it's really frustrating. Let's consider this simple sentence: US wants to capture and kill Bin Laden. Is this correct, or must it read: US wants to capture and TO kill Bin Laden. As you can see, in the second sentence, another 'to' is added just before 'kill.' Which is correct? And in longer sentences, such as this: he was eager to complete the job, and please his boss. Or, must it be: he was eager to complete the job, and TO please his boss. Again, one can see the "to" before 'please,' is that necessary at all?
I hope someone can answer this. It's so tiring, getting to think about this.[6]
Joker
Top answer
Unless it is a headline, it should read ' the US': The US wants to capture and kill Bin Laden . This is fine. A second 'to' is normally omitted as redundant-- so much so that adding it makes the sentence sound awkward and unnatural.
— Mister Micawber
Free · every Monday
Get the Weekly English Kit 📬
New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.
. Unless it is a headline, it should read 'the US':
The US wants to capture and kill Bin Laden.
This is fine. A second 'to' is normally omitted as redundant-- so much so that adding it makes the sentence sound awkward and unnatural. . In your second example, there should be no comma: