"The purpose of the present paper is twofold. First, to examine what beliefs, if any, underlie (a) the Pyrrhonist’s desire for ataraxia and his account of how this state may be attained, and (b) his philanthropic therapy, which seeks to induce by argument epoche and ataraxia in the Dogmatists. Second, to determine whether the Pyrrhonist’s philanthropia and his search for and attainment of ataraxia are, as scholars have generally believed, essential aspects of his stance. The analysis of these issues will let us both better understand the nature of the Pyrrhonean outlook and assess its coherence. This is important especially because Pyrrhonism is a philosophy that may still be found attractive and worth adopting."
I'm not sure about the emboldened sentences.
Best,
Sextus
Top answer
I think the sentences are clear and grammatically correct.
— Rvw
Free · every Monday
Get the Weekly English Kit 📬
New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.
"The analysis of these issues will let allows us to both better understand the nature of the Pyrrhonean outlook and assess its coherence."
Is this ok, or should I rather say: "The analysis of these issues will allow us both to better understand the nature of the Pyrrhonean outlook and to assess its coherence." ?
It's a fine point. I would stay with the original ... will let us both ... for the not very significant reason that let is shorter than allow and does not take to. The sentence is fairly substantial, and let gives you a little simplification.