The New York Times has a blog where they critique lapses in grammar and language usage committed by the newspaper's own writers. In the most recent entry are the following two examples:
(1) "The Stanford researchers said that by providing an objective review of the current science of organic foods, their goal was to allow people to make informed choices."
"[Critique:] A dangler: 'their goal' isn’t providing an objective view, the researchers are."
SuperESL: I was wondering if the problem can be remedied by:
(a) "The Stanford researchers said that in providing an objective review of the current science of organic foods, their goal was to allow people to make informed choices."
OR
(b) "The Stanford researchers said that by providing an objective review of the current science of organic foods, they wish to allow people to make informed choices."
(2) "Fifteen states and the District of Columbia now prohibit teenagers from driving with another teenager, and all but seven states forbid them from driving with more than one.
"[Critique:] Say 'forbid them to drive' rather than 'forbid them from driving.'"
SuperESL: I cannot see what is wrong with 'forbid them from driving'. Is there a subtle difference between 'forbid to' and 'forbid from'?
Thank you.
Top answer
1. Both your fixes work. 2.
— Enoon
Free · every Monday
Get the Weekly English Kit 📬
New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.
My Oxford Advanced Learners' Dictionary lists 'forbid from' as one of the proper usages of the word 'forbid.' The dictionary gives this example as an illustration of this particular usage:
"He forbade them from mentioning this subject again."
As for whether the first of my two attempted fixes of example (1) in my original post works,
I told someobody in another forum that 'forbid ... from' was wrong, and then discovered that there are dozens of citations in the Corpus of Contemporary English,