I'm doing my masters degree in English and I have a question I hope someone can help me with. I have an assignment in which I have been given a text. In this text I have to identify the post-head dependents in the nominals used in the text. In connection with this I have to explain how these nominals are related to the head in terms of the lexical vs. syntactic distinction. And this is where I run into trouble. I mean, as I have understood it, a lexical nominal is basically something (a phrase) that I can look up in the dictionary; but what about syntactic - Aren't all phrases bound by syntax to some extent.
So, I guess my question is this: How would you define "the lexical vs. syntactic distinction"? In my paper, I conclude that in a phrase like "Prisoner of war" the post-head dependent is related lexically to the head, while the post-head dependent in a phrase like "a prosecutor in Boston" is syntactically related to the head - but it is still quite unclear to me.
I hope you can help. Thanks in advance.
Uni
Top answer
sorry, but i don't think you'll find a neat notional definition. there are clues for distinguishing them though. their intonation, for one.
— Sam C
Free · every Monday
Get the Weekly English Kit 📬
New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.