Re: The Mauritius Command - Patrick O'Brian Throughout the above novel the name "Mauritius" is used both with and without the definite article. For example: "to undertake the reduction of the French possessions of the Ile Bourbon, otherwise Ile de la Reunion, otherwise Ile Buonaparte, and of the Mauritius, otherwise Ile de France,"
"Nor can I speak to what Decaen may have had in Mauritius before this reinforcement"
In the majority of cases the article is not used, but on many occasions it is present, and I cannot see a pattern to formulate a regulation, nor can I discover it on Google. I was thinking it may be an antique usage, perhaps a direct translation from the French "L'Ile Maurice" - "the Mauritius Island" ; but in the dialogues, both forms are used, and, to my non-native eye, it is most in the dialogues that O'Brian seems to preserve the 18th/19th century idiom.
Is there a rule that treats of this usage or is it a device of style that he has invented? Thankyou
Top answer
[nq:1]Re: The Mauritius Command - Patrick O'Brian Throughout the above novel the name "Mauritius" is used both with and without ... Mauritius*, otherwise Ile de France," "Nor can I speak to what Decaen may have had in Mauritius before this reinforcement"[/nq] We still do this for place names which have lost an article in living memory. Consider (the) Ukraine.
— Usenet
Free · every Monday
Get the Weekly English Kit 📬
New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.
[nq:1]Re: The Mauritius Command - Patrick O'Brian Throughout the above novel the name "Mauritius" is used both with and without ... Mauritius*, otherwise Ile de France," "Nor can I speak to what Decaen may have had in Mauritius before this reinforcement"[/nq] We still do this for place names which have lost an article in living memory. Consider (the) Ukraine. [nq:1]Thankyou[/nq]
[nq:2]Re: The Mauritius Command - Patrick O'Brian Throughout the above ... what Decaen may have had in Mauritius before this reinforcement"[/nq] [nq:1]We still do this for place names which have lost an article in living memory. Consider (the) Ukraine.[/nq] And The Argentine, The Gambia, The Sudan.
[nq:2]Thankyou[/nq] [nq:1]Please don't omit the space. It feels like fingernails on a >chalkboard.[/nq] Because it is a verbal usage, a truncated version of "I thank you"? My mistake. But "thankyou" would be correct as a noun? Or an adjective?
[nq:1]And The Argentine[/nq] But I do not think that "Argentine" is ever said without the article is it, as in the other examples? In that case I believe that it would be just "Argentina" (although, indeed, we use the article in original Spanish: "la Argentina".)
[nq:2]And The Argentine[/nq] [nq:1]But I do not think that "Argentine" is ever said without the article is it, as in the other examples? In that case I believe that it would be just "Argentina" (although, indeed, we use the article in original Spanish: "la Argentina".)[/nq] I don't think 'The Argentine" is currently used in English, but I'm sure it was used not all that long ago - that is,
[nq:1]"Peter Moylan" wrote in message[/nq] [nq:2]Please don't omit the space. It feels like fingernails on a >chalkboard.[/nq] [nq:1]Because it is a verbal usage, a truncated version of "I thank you"? My mistake. But "thankyou" would be correct as a noun? Or an adjective?[/nq] Two separate words (a verb and a pronoun) in general, but the hyphenated form for modifying a noun: Th
[nq:1]"Peter Moylan" wrote in message[/nq] [nq:2]Please don't omit the space. It feels like fingernails on a >chalkboard.[/nq] [nq:1]Because it is a verbal usage, a truncated version of "I thank you"? My mistake. But "thankyou" would be correct as a noun? Or an adjective?[/nq] For the noun or adjective, I would write "thank-you". For example, "a thank-you note". This is consistent
[nq:1]"Peter Moylan" wrote in message[/nq] [nq:2]Please don't omit the space. It feels like fingernails on a >chalkboard.[/nq] [nq:1]Because it is a verbal usage, a truncated version of "I thank you"? My mistake. But "thankyou" would be correct as a noun? Or an adjective?[/nq] No, it is not correct. Not in any circumstances. It is always written "thank you".
(>>But "thankyou" would be correct as a noun? Or an >>adjective?) [nq:1]No, it is not correct. Not in any circumstances. It is always written "thank you".[/nq] [nq:1]No. Thankyou doesn't exist.[/nq] Thank you for your replies, but I am a little puzzled by them. According to the Chambers 21st Century Dictionary, "thankyou: 1. an utterance of 'thank you'. 2. an instance of th
[nq:2]Re: The Mauritius Command - Patrick O'Brian Throughout the above ... what Decaen may have had in Mauritius before this reinforcement"[/nq] [nq:1]We still do this for place names which have lost an article in living memory. Consider (the) Ukraine.[/nq] Not to mention Lebanon.
** DAVE HATUNEN (Email Removed) ** * Tucson Arizona, out where the cacti grow * * My typos & m