Bepleased Posted 15 years ago
Essay & Composition Writing
Is [time] considered as a matrix in which something can be formed or developed?
1. [Never put off till tomorrow what may be done today.]
[what may be done today]--(of me) means that today is necessary / expected / intended for what may be done.
2. In 1Samuel 22:15
In "Was that day the first time I inquired of God for him? "
[that day]----it is considered as a day in which I inquired of God for him.
Please tell me can above two ideas make sense to native?
Thanks a lot in advance.
[what may be done today]--(of me) means that today is necessary / expected / intended for what may be done.
2. In 1Samuel 22:15
In "Was that day the first time I inquired of God for him? "
[that day]----it is considered as a day in which I inquired of God for him.
Please tell me can above two ideas make sense to native?
Thanks a lot in advance.
Top answer
Hi, 1. ] [what may be done today]--(of me) Don't say 'of me'. Say 'My version'.
Get the Weekly English Kit 📬
New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.
0
Hi,
1. [Never put off till tomorrow what may be done today.]
[what may be done today]--(of me) Don't say 'of me'. Say 'My version'.
means that
today is necessary / expected / intended for what may be done. <<< I think you have the right idea, but this is written in very poor English
1. [Never put off till tomorrow what may be done today.]
[what may be done today]--(of me) Don't say 'of me'. Say 'My version'.
means that
today is necessary / expected / intended for what may be done. <<< I think you have the right idea, but this is written in very poor English
00
Hi,
Thank you very much to give so nice guidance to me.
I think preparations as a code toknock the door of English logic that is the key of logical chart.
English language is simply a logical chart.
If you can't finish it, you never get into the gate of English and it is unknown to you.
An added question, 'That's all for today.'
[for]----
Thank you very much to give so nice guidance to me.
I think preparations as a code toknock the door of English logic that is the key of logical chart.
English language is simply a logical chart.
If you can't finish it, you never get into the gate of English and it is unknown to you.
An added question, 'That's all for today.'
[for]----
00
Hi,
Sorry about the confusion.
I try to change it and wish it gets intelligible to a native speaker.
1. [Never put off till tomorrow what may be done today.]
------what may be done in today;
Is it good at a native speaker?
Thank you so much.
Sorry about the confusion.
I try to change it and wish it gets intelligible to a native speaker.
1. [Never put off till tomorrow what may be done today.]
------what may be done in today;
Is it good at a native speaker?
Thank you so much.
00
Hi,
An added question, 'That's all for today.'
[for]--
(my version) "in" --as the use : "Some where in time"
[is]--
(my version) "is equal unto" / like the use: Who is (= belongs to) that? It
An added question, 'That's all for today.'
[for]--
(my version) "in" --as the use : "Some where in time"
[is]--
(my version) "is equal unto" / like the use: Who is (= belongs to) that? It
00
Hi,
1. [Never put off till tomorrow what may be done today.]
--what may be done in today;
Is it good at a native speaker? No. We don't say 'in today'.
Clive
1. [Never put off till tomorrow what may be done today.]
--what may be done in today;
Is it good at a native speaker? No. We don't say 'in today'.
Clive
00
Hi,
I’m sorry for the poor way.
“That’s all for today.” -------(my version) That recognizes the whole of job that is scheduled to be finished today.
In the sentence, [is] = recognizes; [for] = that is scheduled to be finished;
Here [verb to be] is different from [verb to be] in [We are the world.].
In [We are the world.], [verb to be] = belong to....
I’m sorry for the poor way.
“That’s all for today.” -------(my version) That recognizes the whole of job that is scheduled to be finished today.
In the sentence, [is] = recognizes; [for] = that is scheduled to be finished;
Here [verb to be] is different from [verb to be] in [We are the world.].
In [We are the world.], [verb to be] = belong to....
00
Hi,
That way ---in today follows the film "Some where in time."
In the use of preposition --in, I feel it all comes to the same use.
Is my feeling right or not?
That way ---in today follows the film "Some where in time."
In the use of preposition --in, I feel it all comes to the same use.
Is my feeling right or not?
00
Hi,
Sorry, again I don't understand most of what you have written.
As I already said., in terms of language we don't say 'in today'.
Clive
Sorry, again I don't understand most of what you have written.
As I already said., in terms of language we don't say 'in today'.
Clive
00
Hi,
Yes, sir.
Can the original---[Never put off till tomorrow what may be done today.] change into "Never put off till tomorrow what may be done for today."?
Is it the same as "That's all for today."?
Does the verb to be---[are] stand for [in regard to]?
Thank you in advance for your assistance.
Yes, sir.
Can the original---[Never put off till tomorrow what may be done today.] change into "Never put off till tomorrow what may be done for today."?
Is it the same as "That's all for today."?
Does the verb to be---[are] stand for [in regard to]?
Thank you in advance for your assistance.
00
Hi,
Yes, sir. Please don't call me 'sir'.
Can the original---[Never put off till tomorrow what may be done today.] change into "Never put off till tomorrow what may be done for today."? Not if you want to speak good English.
Is it the same as "That's all for today.
Yes, sir. Please don't call me 'sir'.
Can the original---[Never put off till tomorrow what may be done today.] change into "Never put off till tomorrow what may be done for today."? Not if you want to speak good English.
Is it the same as "That's all for today.
0