0Is the following sentence grammatically correct in the sense of the usage of infinitive "to"02br 02br 01font01b00" To see the scene, I was shocked."02b00 02font02br 02br 00meaning, When I saw the scene, I was shocked. 02br 02br 00I understand, usually in this type of sentence, we are supposed to use gerund ;02br 02br 01font00"Seeing the scene, I was shocked."02font02br 02br 00If the sentense above is grammatically correct, is that the same usage as 02br 02br 01font00" To be frank with you, it was my fault."02font02br 02br 00Please explain out to me.02br 02br 01font05002font010id2
Top answer
02i 02br 02br 00 We can't use the same logic with 01i 00to be frank02i 00. If we say 01i 00It was my fault to be frank with you02i 00, we're saying that being frank was a fault! 02i 02br 02br 00 CJ010id1
— CalifJim
Free · every Monday
Get the Weekly English Kit 📬
New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.
0 You need 01i00I was shocked to see the scene02i00.02br 02br 01i00to see the scene02i00 explains why you were shocked so it falls most naturally after 01i00shocked02i00.02br 02br 00 Compare:02br 02br 01i00I was happy to see you.02br 00 I am glad to be
0Thank you for your prompt and logical explanation.02br 02br 01font00"To see the scene, I was convinced that I was wrong."02font02br 02br 00Can we interpret the sentence above as "inversion" form of02br 02br 01font00"I was convinced that I was wrong to see the scene"02fon
0 No. The meaning is different. This is not mere inversion.02br 02br 00 The first sentence will be interpreted as 01i00When I saw the scene, I was convinced that I was wrong.02i00 In other words the seeing of the scene caused me to realize that I was wrong. Note the placement of 01i00to see the scene02i00 near 01i00