My wife is scheduled to be induced on Monday and the doctor refers to the process as induction. Our last doctor used the same term for the same process, and in fact "induction" is used in every relevant M.D-authored article I've read. However, when I looked up the terms in the dictionary, "induction" was defined as "the act of inducting," while "inducement" was defined as "the act of inducing." "Induct" and "induce" are two entirely different words and therefore "induction" and "inducement" are entirely different. Since it would make most sense that the docs are referring to "the act of inducing" when they say my wife is scheduled for induction, I am confused by their apparently universal use of the term "induction." All of these docs are certainly much smarter than I am, which makes me think I must be missing something. So... what am I missing here? Is she really being "inducted" when she's induced? Which is the correct term for the process of inducing labor? Thanks!
Top answer
I take your point. The "misuse" has obviously worked its way into the vernacular, but it may take some of the traditional dictionaries a while to catch up. Have you consulted an up-to-date medical dictionary?
— Avangi
Free · every Monday
Get the Weekly English Kit 📬
New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.
It is simply that the word has been accepted in that field with that meaning. [url=http://www.macmillandictionary.com/dictionary/american/induction] HERE[/url] is the MacMillan Dictionary entry. Word use and meaning do not always continue to adhere to root etymology through time.