I did my best but I need your help!

0Hello02br
02br
00I am not a native English and I had to write a long essay about the Theory of Jutice-Rawls. I have proofread it and every thing but I am not sure about the following passages. Please can someone 01del00native English preferably02del00 can have a look at it and correct the spelling, grammar and flow. It has to remain very academic. Thank you very much in advance to anyone that can help before Monday. Oh yes! The passagedo not follow each other in my essay!02br
02br
00Cheers02br
02br
00 With A01i00 theory of Justice02i00 (ATJ), John Rawls attempts to propose an alternative to the major political view dominating Anglo-Saxon politics, namely utilitarianism01i00.02i00 As such, Rawls' work emphasises the rights of the individuals over the good. 00Rawls focuses on the basic structure of the society and aims to demonstrate that it can become efficient in bringing social liberties and equality into balance.02br
02br
02br
02br
00Finally, Rawls not only justifies the original position as optimum in initiating impartial negotiations that are to lead to fair principles of justice; but as a means to evince our inner presuppositions00 00about social justice. While the veil of ignorance negates arbitrary public outcomes, the process of negotiations under the veil of ignorance generates a00 00'reflective equilibrium'00.00 00Explicitly, this means that individuals, being divested from their backgrounds and through the constraints of 01i00reasonable02i00 deliberation, would be able ascertain their fundamental conviction of justice.00 00The hypothetical nature of the original position is justified by the fact that its aims to unveil unbiased principles of justice upon which a 01i00fair02i00 society can be formed.02br
02br
00-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------02br
02br
00In conclusion, Rawls propose a theory which In conclusion, Rawls propose a theory which assigns the basic structure of society as the main actor of social justice. In order to do this, he developed a hypothetical social contract in which individuals have to decide on the very principles of justice that will be the basis of their society. Rawls demonstrates that under impartial circumstances and bound by a common desire to improve one's good, individuals would opt for principles which would unconditionally protect their equal rights and liberties. According to Rawls, the reflective equilibrium reached from the original position gives, credence to his theory. This contradicts counteracts utilitarian notion of society. 0-