0 Hi Clive,02br 02br 00 Well, here it is the summary of the monograph I told you. If you could take a look and point out possible mistakes, 01b00I'd be vey grateful! 02b02br 00 This monograph attempts to show the reality of a current and polemical topic in Brazil: infant adoption by homosexual couples. To better understand 00the topic, first, there is a brief history00 00of the evolution of family patterns and the changes that have taken place in the Brazilian family are discussed, showing the new extant patterns nowadays.00 00 00In the next chapter, the acceptance 01b00(or approval ?) 02b00to00 homosexual union is shown 00by 00in the international scene and in Brazilian juridical system,00 00besides there is also a brief study of the 00prejudice with regard to the homosexual in the course of history, with equality principle prevailing. 00This00 00chapter discusses00 00the adoption problem in Brazil, as well as its requirements and 00purpose that is to assure the child and adolescent’s right to the family and community environments.02br 02br 00 00 00In the final chapter the core idea of this monograph is reached, adoption by gay couples. First, it addresses the00 00problem that has permeated most of the adoptions00 00by homosexuals in Brazil: when a homosexual couple wants to adopt, one of the partners has to be chosen in order to formalize the petition for adoption (formal petition), but, in practice, both parents raise this child. It becomes evident00 00that the bond between the child and the partner of his adopter doesn’t find a proper juridical custody (a proper00 00judicial solution) that preserves the best interests of the minor. Also, the monograph discusses * 01b00the legal possibility00 00of homosexual couples 02b01u00adopting jointly02u00, presenting studies about adoption’s psychological viability by these pairs and giving an account of the first favorable judicial decisions to adoption by them02br 02br 00 * Here the verb is in gerund form, so its meaning (considering the gerund form) seems strange in the sentence, no? By the way, what would be the correct form ? I don't know if I am right, but I suppose it should be: 01b00Also, the monograph discusses the legal possibility of homosexual couples 01u00adopt jointly,...02u02b00 Isn't it?02br 02br 00This 0-
Top answer
02br 02br 00I just need to know if after all the corrections I have done, there still are some mistakes. Please, I really need that someone in this forum helps me because it is 01b 01u 01i 00a summary of a monograph02i 02u 02b 00. Many thanks in advance!
— Anonymous
Free · every Monday
Get the Weekly English Kit 📬
New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.
0Hi!02br 02br 00I just need to know if after all the corrections I have done, there still are some mistakes. Please, I really need that someone in this forum helps me because it is 01b01u01i00a summary of a monograph02i02u02b00. Many thanks in advance! 02br 02br 01b01u00Here is the summar
0I don't know the word "extant" but based on my quick look in the dictionary, it seems redundant to say current extant, or extant nowadays (and nowadays is too informal for this writing) so just pick either current or extant. I would use acceptance. There are many thing people accept without overtly approving. "Scene" is too informal as well. There are too many colons used - you'll have to rewri
0Hello Ms.Geek,02br 02br 00You can't imagine how grateful I am for your help. Thank you very much!02br 02br 00Now, please take a look at the following part you said you didn't get my idea:02br 02br 00"This chapter discusses the adoption problem in Brazil, as well as its requirements and purpose: to ensure the child and adolescent's righ
0Hi,02br 02br 00I've made a number of edits and comments.02br 02br 00Clive02br 02br 01font00This monograph attempts to show the reality01i00 01u00<< say it another way02u02i00 of a current and polemical topic in Brazil: infant adoption by homosexual couples. To be
0Hello Grammar Geek (and Clive),02br 02br 00 Sorry, but I have decided to send this text twice because I have to hand in this summary right away. When I wrote to Clive, he said I could send my summary for correction, that he would read it if he had time. If he couldn't, another one would do it for sure. But as time passed by and I didn't get a reply, I thought Clive perhaps,