Tiểu Cầm Posted 10 years ago
Letter Writing
Help me to correct the IELTS essay. Please give me an overall mark (if possible). Thanks all of you.
Wild animals have no place in the 21st century, so protecting them is a waste of resources. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
It is true that there are hardly habitats for wild animals to live today. However, I completely disagree with the point of wiew that protecting these animals is meaningless.
Wildlife comservation will hugely benefit humanity in terms of living environment and economy state. On the environmental level, conserving ecosystems is the utterly fundamental requirement, giving the wild creatures favourable places to develop. Consequently, natural environments such as forest and ocean are certainly protected, helping remove industrial pollutants like greenhouse gas emission. This allows human beings to live longer and healthily due to cleaner and fresher living environment. On the economic perspective, any country has a powerful source of wild animals can expect to bring about abundant income. Some particular products from the nature animals like wallets made from crocodile skin have always been the all-time favourite items.
Protection of wild animals also ensures our descendants better future. The variety and diversity of natural communities can be guaranteed. As a result, our futuristic generations may have as many good opportunities as their ancestors to study and research the creatures for better life quality. While we people dismiss the animals in wild world now, I imagine how much weight that our children will have to bear because of lack of wild creatures. They will expect to lead a lonely life almost without any living organisms but human. Finally, our action to conserve wild animals tends to give our younger generations numerous moral messages and awalys makes them respect their ancestors.
In conclusion, I strongly believe that wild animals worth protecting for our own profits
It is true that there are hardly habitats for wild animals to live today. However, I completely disagree with the point of wiew that protecting these animals is meaningless.
Wildlife comservation will hugely benefit humanity in terms of living environment and economy state. On the environmental level, conserving ecosystems is the utterly fundamental requirement, giving the wild creatures favourable places to develop. Consequently, natural environments such as forest and ocean are certainly protected, helping remove industrial pollutants like greenhouse gas emission. This allows human beings to live longer and healthily due to cleaner and fresher living environment. On the economic perspective, any country has a powerful source of wild animals can expect to bring about abundant income. Some particular products from the nature animals like wallets made from crocodile skin have always been the all-time favourite items.
Protection of wild animals also ensures our descendants better future. The variety and diversity of natural communities can be guaranteed. As a result, our futuristic generations may have as many good opportunities as their ancestors to study and research the creatures for better life quality. While we people dismiss the animals in wild world now, I imagine how much weight that our children will have to bear because of lack of wild creatures. They will expect to lead a lonely life almost without any living organisms but human. Finally, our action to conserve wild animals tends to give our younger generations numerous moral messages and awalys makes them respect their ancestors.
In conclusion, I strongly believe that wild animals worth protecting for our own profits
Top answer
While i t is may be true to some extent that there are hardly any viable habitats left for wild animals to live in toda y, However, I completely disagree with the point of wiew view that protecting these animals is meaningless. W ildlife comservation conservation will hugely benefit humanity in terms of our living environment and the econom y. state.
Get the Weekly English Kit 📬
New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.
0
While it is may be true to some extent that there are hardly any viable habitats left for wild animals to live in today, However, I completely disagree with the point of wiew view that protecting these animals is meaningless. Wildlife comservation conservation will hugely benefit human
00
As we previously discussed, Recently I have been working three to four extra hours a day without overtime pay.
As per Zadco and speedy recruitment the working hours is 6 to 6 12hrs,without this I am doing the work In night also I am going 10 a clock once and 3a clock because to see the HLG workers doing work or not. For this if I can get over time it will be help full for me, without get
As per Zadco and speedy recruitment the working hours is 6 to 6 12hrs,without this I am doing the work In night also I am going 10 a clock once and 3a clock because to see the HLG workers doing work or not. For this if I can get over time it will be help full for me, without get
00
I don't understand most of what you wrote, but I gather it may have something to do with your working conditions. Please start a new thread and post it to the Letters Forum.
0