I have a question about something I can't find any information about. I call them grammatical forks (after the chess term). They occur when two parts of a sentence dictate conflicting constructions. Here's a (crummy) example:
"We must treat Ghandi like who[m]ever we think he was."
"like" takes an object form (whomever); the phrase "who[]ever we think he was" takes the subject.
Has anyone thought about this kind of dilemma? Is there concensus? Basically, does the linear/local construction (giving the object form) or the phrasal/insertive nature of English grammar (giving subject form) win out?
I apologize for the poor example. It gets the grammar across event though it's not a very compelling sentence. I've come across real, sensical ones though---I just can't recall them.
Thanks so much. K
Top answer
It is not a dilemma. Priority belongs to the dependent clause (it is the entire dependent clause that is the object of 'like'): We must treat Ghandi like whoever we think he was. ('We think' is an inserted comment clause.
— Mister Micawber
Free · every Monday
Get the Weekly English Kit 📬
New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.