OUR EXPERTISE AND INTEGRITY AS PROFESSIONAL CIVIL ENGINEERS HAS BEEN ALWAYS IN CONSTANT TEST. THE CHALLENGE TO RESPOND TO THE NEEDS OF DELIVERING QUALITY AND ROBUST STRUCTURES READY TO WITHSTAND ALMOST ALL POSSIBLE UNTOWARD INCIDENTS WHETHER IT IS MANMADE OR ACT OF NATURE IS A NEVER-ENDING DARE FOR EACH ONE OF US. IN REALITY, TECHNICAL CATASTROPHES OCCURRING IN ENGINEERED STRUCTURES ARE NOT ACCEPTED BY THE SOCIETY. THE REACTION OF THE SOCIETY, THAT IS LARGELY SUPPORTED AND AMPLIFIED BY THE MEDIA FOR OBVIOUS PECUNIARY REASONS IS TO TRY TO FIND AND PUNISH THE PERSONS IN WHICH GENERALLY THE ENGINEERS ARE CONSIDERED PRIMARILY RESPONSIBLE. THIS POSITION IS OF COURSE ACCEPTABLE WHEN THE CATASTROPHE IS DUE TO HUMAN DEFICIENCY, NEGLIGENCE OR LOSS OF ADAPTED SURVEY AND MAINTENANCE. HOWEVER, THE IDEA THAT A CATASTROPHE MAY OCCUR DUE TO UNKNOWN AND UNPREDICTABLE NEW PHENOMENON OF EITHER A NATURAL OR A TECHNICAL NATURE IS NOT ADMITTED.
Top answer
Here, I learned that there is no need to write your text in capital letters. Apparently, it's like shouting.
— Wildblue
Free · every Monday
Get the Weekly English Kit 📬
New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.
Our expertise and integrity as professional civil engineers has have (edited to fix my mistake) always been constantly tested. The challenge of delivering quality and robust structures ready to withstand almost all possible untoward incidents, whether man-made or act of nature, is a never-ending task for each one of us. Technical catastrophes in engin
I am sorry but I would like to ask a question too. Why isn't it "Our expertise and integrity as professional civil engineers have always been constantly tested. "? expertise and intergrity makes up two, so why not 'have'?
Anonymous I am sorry but I would like to ask a question too. Why isn't it "Our expertise and integrity as professional civil engineers have always been constantly tested. "? expertise and intergrity makes up two, so why not 'have'?