I just reread The Rebel Angels, by Robertson Davies, and was struck by the following sentence: "Where, I wondered, had Arthur picked up such a friend, who was as near as our modern age allows to what used to be called a matinee idol." (For anyone who wants to examine the original, this is the last sentence of the first paragraph of the second section of the last chapter.) This awoke a long slumbering puzzle for me: are there circumstances where a long, complex question like this one can properly be ended with a period? I have seen that usage on many occasions, but I don't see how it can be correct. On the other hand, ending such a sentence with a question mark seems awkward. I applied the rule of thumb for sorting out I/me and he/him: reduce the sentence to its essentials and see whether it looks right. Here the essential sentence appears to be "Where had Arthur picked up such a friend?" In that form it must surely end with a question mark.
I could change the question to a statement by replacing "Where, I wondered" with "I wondered where," but I don't see how that construction could be found in the original. In this case the author was not only an accomplished author, but also a journalist, professor, Shakespearean actor, and all-around man of letters, with a degree in literature from Oxford. I don't see how he could make a mistake like this, if it is a mistake; nor do I see how it could be otherwise.
Top answer
[nq:1]I just reread The Rebel Angels, by Robertson Davies, and was struck by the following sentence: "Where, I wondered, had ... [/nq] Perhaps it's an unintentional mistake, and nothing more. Mal
— Usenet
Free · every Monday
Get the Weekly English Kit 📬
New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.
[nq:1]I just reread The Rebel Angels, by Robertson Davies, and was struck by the following sentence: "Where, I wondered, had ... could make a mistake like this, if it is a mistake; nor do I see how it could be otherwise.[/nq] Perhaps it's an unintentional mistake, and nothing more.
[nq:1]In this case the author was not only an accomplished author, but also a journalist, professor, Shakespearean actor, and all-around man of letters, with a degree in literature from Oxford.[/nq] And therefore able to do just what he likes and call it a literary device!
[nq:1]I just reread The Rebel Angels, by Robertson Davies, and was struck by the following sentence: "Where, I wondered, had ... could make a mistake like this, if it is a mistake; nor do I see how it could be otherwise.[/nq] I do that all the time; hitting the full-point key is second nature, at the end of a sentence that's why you have proofreaders. Maybe the proofreaders in question should
[nq:2]I just reread The Rebel Angels, by Robertson Davies, and ... mistake; nor do I see how it could be otherwise.[/nq] [nq:1]I do that all the time; hitting the full-point key is second nature, at the end of a sentence that's why you have proofreaders. Maybe the proofreaders in question should have worked a little harder.[/nq] The emphasis should be on the second clause, not the first. W
[nq:2]I do that all the time; hitting the full-point key ... the proofreaders in question should have worked a little harder.[/nq] [nq:1]The emphasis should be on the second clause, not the first. With no inflection, the interrogative form is embedded in the imperative statement, so there is no mistake.[/nq] Dear *** in Heaven.
[nq:1]I just reread The Rebel Angels, by Robertson Davies, and was struck by the following sentence: "Where, I wondered, had Arthur picked up such a friend, who was as near as our modern age allows to what used to be called a matinee idol."[/nq] This doesn't seem to be a question to me. It seems to be roughly equivalent, in terms of meaning, to: "I wondered where Arthur had picked up such a fr
[nq:1]I just reread The Rebel Angels, by Robertson Davies, and was struck by the following sentence: "Where, I wondered, had ... "Where, I wondered" with "I wondered where," but I don't see how that construction could be found in the original.[/nq] Why not? Take, eg, "I ask you how that construction can be found." With a poetic inversion, that can become "How, I ask you, can that construction
[nq:1]The emphasis should be on the second clause, not the first. With no inflection, the interrogative form is embedded in the imperative statement, so there is no mistake.[/nq] I hope you can explain that in more elementary terms. My days of diagramming sentences are long past, and I didn't follow what you said. Approaching the sentence intuitively, it seems to me that two components are
[nq:2]I just reread The Rebel Angels, by Robertson Davies, and ... allows to what used to be called a matinee idol."[/nq] [nq:1]This doesn't seem to be a question to me. It seems to be roughly equivalent, in terms of meaning, to: ... our modern age allows to what used to be called a matinee idol". In which case, there is no mistake.[/nq] I concur. It's a statement concerning "my" thoughs,