I learned that " If + subject + (verb)past sentence, ~ would (could , might,...)" is conditional sentences.
But, they say that I have to use 'were' instead of 'was', if the verb is "be" - verb.
For example, Is " The man looked as if he was drunk." not correct? Do I have to say, " The man looked as if he were drunk." Or, both are possible?
What about "If I was you, I would not do that." May I use it? I read that "If I were you~" is idionmatic, then maybe can not say " If I was you~". I am looking forward any answer.
Top answer
Hello Jisu98. It is very common to use were instead of was after if , both formally and informally. In a formal style , were is more common than was , and many people consider it more correct, especially in American English.
— X11
Free · every Monday
Get the Weekly English Kit 📬
New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.
It is very common to use were instead of was after if, both formally and informally. In a formal style, were is more common than was, and many people consider it more correct, especially in American English.
This thread is so old that it would have been better for you to start a new thread with your question.
Objects take the third person form of the verb.
In your example, the subject is actually "it" which is not an object, and the subjunctive is used. It's used for (among other things) situations that are contrary to actual fact.