Does "change factual premises with wanton abandon" mean "replace factual foundations with ridiculous ideas"?
Background info:
The Internet is riddled with so-called pro-life web sites that repeat this ridiculous story, and incidentally change factual premises with wanton abandon. Here's another version. 'If you knew a woman who was pregnant, who had 8 kids already, three of whom were deaf, two who were blind, one mentally retarded (all because she had syphilis), would you recommend that she have an abortion? Then you would have killed Beethoven.' This render- ing of the legend demotes the great composer from fifth to ninth in the birth order, raises the number born deaf to three and the number born blind to two, and gives syphilis to the mother instead of the father. Most of the forty-three websites I found when search- ing for versions of the story attribute it not to Maurice Baring but to a certain Professor L. R. Agnew at UCLA Medical School, who is said to have put the dilemma to his students and to have told them, 'Congratulations, you have just murdered Beethoven.' We might charitably give L. R. Agnew the benefit of doubting his existence - it is amazing how these urban legends sprout. I cannot discover whether it was Baring who originated the legend, or whether it was invented earlier.
Top answer
Plus, does "the benefit of doubting his existence" mean "the credit of denying his (Beethoven's) existence"?
— SweetFreedom
Free · every Monday
Get the Weekly English Kit 📬
New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.
SweetFreedomDoes "change factual premises with wanton abandon" mean "replace factual foundations with ridiculous ideas"?
Adverbial "with wanton abandon" describes the unrestrained or reckless manner in which factual premises are changed. It does not mean that the premises are changed into "wanton abandon", if that's what you're thinking.