All of a sudden, I tried to make up a sentence but I became stuck in some point now. Here is the sentence.
I am the one who can be ingored by them. That's why I always try to respect all of them and their opinions.
I am the one who could be ingored by them. That's why I always try to respect all of them and their opinions.
I know how to use "could" and the nuance difference of both, and it means "humbleness".
But the problem is that I think the second one could sound awkward because it sound too humble or something. What do you think? Do you think there is a difference or any preferance?
Thank you all the time in advance.
Top answer
They are both awkward; we do not normally make a pronoun the overt agent of a passive verb. These are natural: 1. They can ignore me: that's why I always try to respect them and their opinions .
— Mister Micawber
Free · every Monday
Get the Weekly English Kit 📬
New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.
They are both awkward; we do not normally make a pronoun the overt agent of a passive verb. These are natural:
1. They can ignore me: that's why I always try to respect them and their opinions. 2. They could ignore me: that's why I always try to respect them and their opinions.
Neither statement has anything to do with humility. #1 suggests that the ignoring