0
Niue Posted 16 years ago
Grammar

• assured that vs. were sure that

Hi!

I read the following article in a TOEIC book:



“Politicians assured that the government actions to address the growing crisis would bring a positive outcome to the economy. They do not want citizens and the business community to continue to worry about the high price of oil. Governments are demanding that the OPEC-member nations increase their export to lower the prices.” ((Economy RC 1000 – 3, p. 211))



I think “assured” in the first sentence should be corrected into “were sure”.



1. You CAN say “They were sure that the actions would bring a positive outcome.”

2. You can NOT say “They assure that the actions would bring a positive outcome.”

3. You CAN say “They assured him that the actions would bring a positive outcome.”



What do you think? Am I right?

Thanks in advance.
  

Top answer

Niue Am I right? I don't think you are right. Assure is a transitive verb; in other words, it can take an object.

Free · every Monday

Get the Weekly English Kit 📬

New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.

4 Answers
0
NiueAm I right?
I don't think you are right. Assure is a transitive verb; in other words, it can take an object. The object can be a that clause. Just as you can say: I know that he is here, you can say They assure that the actions will bring a positive outcome.

CB
0
Sorry, let me correct the second sentence:

2. You can NOT say “They assured that the actions would bring a positive outcome.”
0
Thanks, Cool Breeze.

I don't think ALL transitive verbs can take 'that-clause' as its object, but, in this case, I've realized that 'assure' can take 'that-clause' as its object. Let me explain why I made the wrong assumption (that 'assure' can NOT take 'that-clause' as its object):

I tried to find any example sentence which shows the structre 'assure + that-clause', but I could