0
Anonymous Posted 14 years ago
Grammar

are born vs. were born

A. You are born to be a star.
B. You were born to be a star.

1.  Which of the above is correct?  Before, I was confident that "were born" was the correct answer since it is definitely a past event.  However, I watched a TV show lately and the judge said "You are born to be a star.".  Now, I am confused which one is correct or if both are acceptable.

2.  If both are OK, what is the difference in meaning?

Please advise.  Thank you.
  

Top answer

The judge misspoke.

Free · every Monday

Get the Weekly English Kit 📬

New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.

7 Answers
0
The judge misspoke.
0
Yes, the tense is wrong. He probably meant something along the lines of You are destined to be a star.
0
Thank you.
So the correct version is "You were born to be a star".

I think I misheard him. He probably said "You're born to be a star." His "you're" is probably a contraction for "you were". Would you agree?
0
AnonymousI think I misheard him. He probably said "You're born to be a star." His "you're" is probably a contraction for "you were". Would you agree?
It's possible, though you were is rarely contracted. He might have just spoken fast.
0
Thank you, again, for your answer. Great help! Emotion: smile
0
He might also have been trying to say, "You are a born star."
0
That could be what he was thinking. Thank you again, enoon, for your help.