With adjustments for inflation,the relative cost of welfare benefits has been dropping since 1973, resulting in the welfare program now costing about 3 billion real dollars less to implement than in 1973
For me it´s fine but there´s a mistake.
Here´s the correct version:
With adjustments for inflation,the relative cost of welfare benefits has been dropping since 1973, and as a result the welfare program now costs about 3 billion real dollars less to implement than in 1973
Can you help analysing this one?
thanks.
Top answer
The inferior version has too many "ing"s. By substituting "with" for "resulting in" you might eliminate one of the "ing"s. with the welfare program now costing about ...
— CalifJim
Free · every Monday
Get the Weekly English Kit 📬
New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.
The inferior version has too many "ing"s. By substituting "with" for "resulting in" you might eliminate one of the "ing"s. ... with the welfare program now costing about ... It's considered grammatical, but personally I don't like it!
You could also substitute "with the result that the welfare program now costs about ..." The result will be better but still not as go
Which is better is a matter of opinion. It's a question of style rather than grammaticality. I prefer "as a result".
The subject of "resulting" is (the fact that) the relative cost of welfare benefits has been dropping since 1973. In other words, the subject is the dropping of the aforementioned relative cost.